Joshua Shanks wrote:
> This query is run on a test system just after a backup of the database
> has been restored and it does exactly what I expect it to do
[snip]
Obvious questions:
- Have you changed the random page cost on either installation?
- Have both installations had VACUUM ANALYZE run recently?
- Are the stats targets the same on both installations?
- Do both installations have similar shared buffers, total available
RAM info, etc?
--
Craig Ringer
