Re: 9.0 ? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: 9.0 ?
Date
Msg-id 49624A02.1040007@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.0 ?  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: 9.0 ?
Re: 9.0 ?
List pgsql-advocacy
> Current policy is that we don't increment the version number for marketing
> purposes, and at this point it's probably premature to have the discussion
> until we get a complete picture of what items not yet committed will actually
> make it in.
>

Also, it's going to be painful for our redistributors when we switch
over to 10.0, so we're setting a really high bar for that first digit.

We took 10 years to go from 6.0 to 8.0.  Linux is still on version 2, as
is Java, and Perl has been version 5 for ~~ 12 years now.  So, no rush.  ;-)

--Josh



pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Users group on a map
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: PGCon 2008 RFP