Re: pg_restore new option -m - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: pg_restore new option -m
Date
Msg-id 499D7597.50602@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_restore new option -m  (ohp@pyrenet.fr)
List pgsql-hackers

ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
>>
>>> pg_restore -C -m 4 -d template1 db.dmp
>>> gives numerous errors, mostly no such relation at index creation time.
>>
>> You sure you don't get exactly the same without -m?
>>
> yes!

> the pg.gz script shows the output of :
> pg_restore -C -m
> pg_restore -C
> dropdb;createdb; pg_restore -m
>
>   


OK, I'll look at it later today.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore new option -m
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum not honoring pg_autovacuum in 8.3.5?