Tom Lane wrote:
> Gevik Babakhani <pgdev@xs4all.nl> writes:
>> Perhaps it is an idea to have something like:
>> "RAISE ERROR ON NULL INPUT"
>
> [ shrug... ] There's really been no demand for that. If you want a
> particular function to do it, you can put suitable tests and error
> reports into that function. I can't see us adding extra cycles into
> the core function-calling code (which is a very hot hot-spot) for a
> feature with so little demand.
Understood. Thank you (Tom and Greg) for clarifying this.
--
Regards,
Gevik
