Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Date
Msg-id 4A4CCD21.90403@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>   
>> I think it would need to be benchmarked. My faint recollection is that 
>> the re-entrant lexers are slower.
>>     
>
> The flex documentation states in so many words:
>
>     The option `--reentrant' does not affect the performance of the scanner.
>
> Do you feel a need to verify their claim?
>
>
>   

No, I'll take their word for it. I must have been thinking of something 
else.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dickson S. Guedes"
Date:
Subject: Re: First CommitFest: July 15th
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: First CommitFest: July 15th