Robert Haas wrote:
> However, that's not the whole problem, either. To your point about
> documentation, it seems this path doesn't touch the README at all, and
> it needs to, because some of the statements in that file would
> certainly become false were this patch to be applied.
>
> So I think we should at a minimum ask the patch author to (1) fix the
> explain bugs I found and (2) update the README, as well as (3) revert
> needless whitespace changes - there are a couple in execMain.c, from
> the looks of it.
I overlooked the README completely. I'll see what I can do about these
and submit an updated patch in a couple of days.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
