Robert Haas wrote:
>> I'm not saying that we don't
>> want to provide the means to do this, but writeable CTEs alone aren't
>> meant to handle this.
>
> Well, I think a patch to implement writeable CTEs is probably going to
> have to handle this case - I don't think we can just ignore rewrite
> rules when processing a CTE. But it does seem to be beyond the scope
> of the current patch.
My use of "this" was a bit ambiguous here; what I meant was that
writeable CTEs are going to work just like a top-level INSERT ..
RETURNING would have, i.e. return only rows inserted to "project".
> I'm going to go ahead and mark this Ready for Committer. Thanks for
> your patience.
Thanks for reviewing!
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
