Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>> Emmanuel Cecchet wrote:
>>
>>> If you prefer to postpone the auto-partitioning to the next commit
>>> fest, I can strip it from the current patch and re-submit it for the
>>> next fest (but it's just 2 isolated methods really easy to review).
>>>
>
>
>> I certainly think this should be separated out. In general it is not a
>> good idea to roll distinct features together. It complicates both the
>> reviewing process and the discussion.
>>
>
> I think though that Greg was suggesting that we need some more thought
> about the overall road map. Agglomerating "independent" features onto
> COPY one at a time is going to lead to a mess, unless they fit into an
> overall design plan.
>
>
>
I don't disagree with that. But even if we get a roadmap of some set of
features we want to implement, rolling them all together isn't a good
way to go.
cheers
andrew
