Re: SATA drives performance - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | Richard Neill |
---|---|
Subject | Re: SATA drives performance |
Date | |
Msg-id | 4B33F061.1040806@cam.ac.uk Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: SATA drives performance (Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@opengroupware.us>) |
Responses |
Re: SATA drives performance
|
List | pgsql-performance |
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > This isn't true. IBMs IPS series controllers can the checked and configured via the ipssend utility that works very wellin 2.6.x LINUX. > Unfortunately, what we got (in the IBM) was the garbage ServeRaid 8kl card. This one is atrocious - it shipped with a hideous firmware bug. And there is no way to bypass it. The HP have the P400 cards, which are decent in themselves, just not as good as software raid. Richard > "Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Richard Neill <rn214@cam.ac.uk> wrote: >>> >>> Jeremy Harris wrote: >>>> On 12/24/2009 05:12 PM, Richard Neill wrote: >>>>> Of course, with a server machine, it's nearly impossible to use mdadm >>>>> raid: you are usually compelled to use a hardware raid card. >>>> Could you expand on that? >>> Both of the last machines I bought (an IBM X3550 and an HP DL380) come with >>> hardware raid solutions. These are an utter nuisance because: >>> >>> - they can only be configured from the BIOS (or with a >>> bootable utility CD). Linux has very basic monitoring tools, >>> but no way to reconfigure the array, or add disks to empty >>> hot-swap slots while the system is running. >>> >>> - If there is a Linux raid config program, it's not part of the >>> main packaged distro, but usually a pre-built binary, available >>> for only one release/kernel of the wrong distro. >>> >>> - the IBM one had dodgy firmware, which, until updated, caused the >>> disk to totally fail after a few days. >>> >>> - you pay a lot of money for something effectively pointless, and >>> have less control and less flexibility. >>> >>> After my experience with the X3550, I hunted for any server that would ship >>> without hardware raid, i.e. connect the 8 SATA hotswap slots direct to the >>> motherboard, or where the hardware raid could be de-activated completely, >>> and put into pass-through mode. Neither HP nor IBM make such a thing. >> Yep. And that's why I never order servers from them. There are >> dozens of reputable white box builders (I use Aberdeen who give me a 5 >> year all parts warranty and incredible customer service, but there are >> plenty to choose from) and they build the machine I ask them to build. >> For hardware RAID I use Areca 1680 series, and they also provide me >> with machines with software RAID for lighter loads (slave dbs, >> reporting dbs, and stats dbs) >> >> -- >> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance > > -- > Message composed using K-9 mail on Android. > Apologies for improper reply quoting (not supported) by client.
pgsql-performance by date: