Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction
Date
Msg-id 4B47E837.6020900@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hm ... I wonder how badly this fails if perl isn't present?
>
> Before you say that that won't matter, consider "make clean" etc.
> The makefile does have to parse.
>
> It might be sufficient to wrap this test in an "ifneq ($(PERL),)"
> or similar.
>   

OK, can do that.

> Also, some commentary connecting this test to plperl.c's support for
> two interpreters would be a good thing.
>
>             
>   

ITYM in the .sql file(s)?

I also see that I'll have to make a small adjustment in the MSVC build 
programs.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: We need to rethink relation cache entry rebuild
Next
From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Date:
Subject: Re: Add .gitignore files to CVS?