> I have reviewed this patch and it looks good to me. The only
> substantive question I have is why gist_point_consistent() uses a
> different coding pattern for the box case than it does for the polygon
> and circle cases? It's not obvious to me on the face of it why these
> aren't consistent.
gist_circle_consistent/gist_poly_consistent set recheck flag to true because
corresponding index contains only bounding box of indexed values
(circle/polygon). gist_point_consistent could do an exact check. Will add a coments.
> Beyond that, I have a variety of minor whitespace and commenting
> suggestions, so I am attaching an updated version of the patch as well
Agree with your changes. Suppose, there is no objection to commit it?
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
