Query Optimization - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | Kaloyan Iliev Iliev |
---|---|
Subject | Query Optimization |
Date | |
Msg-id | 4BBDD2F3.7030701@digsys.bg Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Query Optimization
Re: Query Optimization |
List | pgsql-performance |
Hi, Can anyone suggest why this query so slow. SELECT version(); version --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PostgreSQL 8.4.2 on i386-portbld-freebsd7.2, compiled by GCC cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD], 32-bit (1 row) explain analyze SELECT DT.value, DT.meassure_date, DT.ms_status_id as status_id, S.descr_bg as status_bg, S.descr_en as status_en, VT.id as value_type_id, VT.descr_en as value_type_en, VT.descr_bg as value_type_bg, T.unit as value_type_unit, T.name as general_value_type, T.ms_db_type_id FROM ms_data AS DT, ms_statuses AS S, ms_value_types AS VT, ms_types AS T, ms_commands_history AS CH WHERE DT.ms_value_type_id = 88 AND DT.meassure_date >= '2010-04-01 1:00:00' AND DT.meassure_date <= '2010-04-01 1:10:00' AND DT.ms_command_history_id = CH.id AND CH.ms_device_id = 7 AND DT.ms_value_type_id = VT.id AND VT.ms_type_id = T.id AND DT.ms_status_id = S.id GROUP BY value, meassure_date, status_id, status_bg, status_en, value_type_id, value_type_en, value_type_bg, value_type_unit, general_value_type, ms_db_type_id ORDER BY meassure_date DESC; QUERY PLAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group (cost=23.93..23.96 rows=1 width=229) (actual time=63274.021..63274.021 rows=0 loops=1) -> Sort (cost=23.93..23.94 rows=1 width=229) (actual time=63274.016..63274.016 rows=0 loops=1) Sort Key: dt.meassure_date, dt.value, dt.ms_status_id, s.descr_bg, s.descr_en, vt.id, vt.descr_en, vt.descr_bg, t.unit, t.name, t.ms_db_type_id Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 17kB -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..23.92 rows=1 width=229) (actual time=63273.982..63273.982 rows=0 loops=1) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..19.64 rows=1 width=165) (actual time=63273.977..63273.977 rows=0 loops=1) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..15.36 rows=1 width=101) (actual time=63273.974..63273.974 rows=0 loops=1) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..11.08 rows=1 width=23) (actual time=63273.970..63273.970 rows=0 loops=1) -> Index Scan using ms_commands_history_ms_device_id_idx on ms_commands_history ch (cost=0.00..4.33 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.163..25254.004 rows=9807 loops=1) Index Cond: (ms_device_id = 7) -> Index Scan using ms_data_ms_command_history_id_idx on ms_data dt (cost=0.00..6.74 rows=1 width=31) (actual time=3.868..3.868 rows=0 loops=9807) Index Cond: (dt.ms_command_history_id = ch.id) Filter: ((dt.meassure_date >= '2010-04-01 01:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (dt.meassure_date <= '2010-04-01 01:10:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (dt.ms_value_type_id = 88)) -> Index Scan using ms_value_types_pkey on ms_value_types vt (cost=0.00..4.27 rows=1 width=82) (never executed) Index Cond: (vt.id = 88) -> Index Scan using ms_types_pkey on ms_types t (cost=0.00..4.27 rows=1 width=72) (never executed) Index Cond: (t.id = vt.ms_type_id) -> Index Scan using ms_statuses_pkey on ms_statuses s (cost=0.00..4.27 rows=1 width=68) (never executed) Index Cond: (s.id = dt.ms_status_id) Total runtime: 63274.256 ms Thanks in advance. Kaloyan Iliev
pgsql-performance by date: