Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review
Date
Msg-id 4C56DD99020000250003409E@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review  (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner írta:
>> I wonder whether this patch shouldn't be rejected with a request
>> that the timeout framework be submitted to the next CF.  Does
>> anyone feel this approach (without the framework) should be
>> pursued further?
> 
> I certainly think so, the current scheme seems to be very fragile
> and doesn't want to be extended.
Sorry, I phrased that question in a rather confusing way; I'm not
sure, but it sounds like you're in favor of dropping this approach
and pursuing the timeout framework in the next CF -- is that right?
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Date:
Subject: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review