On 10-08-06 11:45 AM, Gordon Shannon wrote:
> OK, so if it knew that all vacuumable tuples could be found in 492 pages, and
> it scanned only those pages, then how could it be that it reports 16558
> removable tuples from those 492 pages, when it has already reported earlier
> that it removed 45878 tuples -- a number we know in fact to be correct? How
> could both statements be correct?
It found 45878 dead tuples in 396 pages for the index authors_archive_pkey.
It found 16558 dead tuples in 492 pages for the table authors_archive.
--
Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
