Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
Date
Msg-id 4C69D808.8040007@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Another idea that comes to mind is that you have vacuum_cost_page_dirty
> set to an unreasonably large value, so that autovac is blocking whenever
> it has to write even one page.

Nope.  Default.  And total cost was raised to 1000.

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Re: shared_preload_libraries is ignored in single user mode
Next
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Re: security label support, part.2