Hi,
On 09/21/2010 08:05 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Hmm, no reason? The reason is that the alternative is that the session
> would hang until a standby arrived that offered that level of service.
> Why would you want that behaviour? Would you really request that option?
I think I now agree with Simon on that point. It's only an issue in
multi-master replication, where continued operation would lead to a
split-brain situation.
With master-slave, you only need to make sure your master stays the
master even if the standby crash(es) are followed by a master crash. If
your cluster-ware is too clever and tries a fail-over on a slave that's
quicker to come up, you get the same split-brain situation.
Put another way: if you let your master continue, don't ever try a
fail-over after a full-cluster crash.
Regards
Markus Wanner
