On 24/09/10 17:13, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 16:01 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>
>> I'd like that we now follow Josh Berkus (and some other) advice now, and
>> start a new thread to decide what we mean by synchronous replication,
>> what kind of normal behaviour we want and what responses to errors we
>> expect to be able to deal with in what (optional) ways.
>
> What I intend to do from here is make a list of all desired use cases,
> then ask for people to propose ways of configuring those. Hopefully we
> don't need to discuss the meaning of the phrase "sync rep", we just need
> to look at the use cases.
Yes, that seems like a good way forward.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
