Re: Slow count(*) again... - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: Slow count(*) again...
Date
Msg-id 4CB1209E.9000706@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Slow count(*) again...  (Mladen Gogala <mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com>)
Responses Re: Slow count(*) again...
List pgsql-performance
On 10/09/2010 06:54 PM, Mladen Gogala wrote:
> In another database, whose name I will not mention, there is a parameter
> db_file_multiblock_read_count which specifies how many blocks will be
> read by a single read when doing a full table scan. PostgreSQL is in
> dire need of something similar and it wouldn't even be that hard to
> implement.

You're correct in that it isn't particularly difficult to implement for
sequential scans. But I have done some testing with aggressive read
ahead, and although it is clearly a big win with a single client, the
benefit was less clear as concurrency was increased.

Joe

--
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support


Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Mladen Gogala
Date:
Subject: Re: Slow count(*) again...
Next
From: Mladen Gogala
Date:
Subject: Re: Slow count(*) again...