Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Vitalii Tymchyshyn
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date
Msg-id 4D4A7B69.2020704@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
List pgsql-performance
02.02.11 20:32, Robert Haas написав(ла):
>
> Yeah.  Any kind of bulk load into an empty table can be a problem,
> even if it's not temporary.  When you load a bunch of data and then
> immediately plan a query against it, autoanalyze hasn't had a chance
> to do its thing yet, so sometimes you get a lousy plan.

May be introducing something like 'AutoAnalyze' threshold will help? I
mean that any insert/update/delete statement that changes more then x%
of table (and no less then y records) must do analyze right after it was
finished.
Defaults like x=50 y=10000 should be quite good as for me.

Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Which RAID Controllers to pick/avoid?
Next
From: Glyn Astill
Date:
Subject: Re: Which RAID Controllers to pick/avoid?