Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Date
Msg-id 4D575CF4.4050901@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Responses Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
List pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Now, what I think I would do about the core package is a quite simple
> backport of them, using Martin's excellent work.  Do we want our own QA
> on them?  If yes, I think I would need some help here, maybe with some
> build farm support for running from our debian packages rather than from
> either CVS or git.
>   

What the RPM packaging does is run this (approximately):
       pushd src/test/regress       make all       make MAX_CONNECTIONS=5 check

Something similar might be sufficient for QA on the Debian packaging 
too.  The overhead of the buildfarm makes sense if you want to rebuild 
after every single commit.  It may be overkill to go through that just 
for testing .deb packaging, which realistically you're only going to 
want to do after each point release.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support  www.2ndQuadrant.us




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TYPE 2: skip already-provable no-work rewrites