Re: Postgres 8.4 memory related parameters - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Shaun Thomas
Subject Re: Postgres 8.4 memory related parameters
Date
Msg-id 4E3B15EB.1020603@peak6.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres 8.4 memory related parameters  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: Postgres 8.4 memory related parameters
List pgsql-performance
On 08/04/2011 04:54 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:

>> it peaked at 2x physical cores, where it ended up being 60%
>> faster than true cores.
>
> Not sure I understand the terminology here -- "physical cores" is
> counting HT or not?

No. So with a dual X5675, that's 12 cores. My numbers peaked at
24-concurrency. At that concurrency, HT was 60% faster than non-HT.
Sorry if I mixed my terminology. :)

--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas@peak6.com

______________________________________________

See  http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer.php
for terms and conditions related to this email

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)"
Date:
Subject: Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption
Next
From: "Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)"
Date:
Subject: Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption