Re: Re: proposal: schema variables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Re: proposal: schema variables
Date
Msg-id 4d2e713c026632e11afeb679088112339ea74e65.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: proposal: schema variables  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2025-01-20 at 15:15 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yes, I think we passed the Desirability criteria with the feedback on
> this thread, but it is now a question of whether the code complexity
> justifies the feature.  I saw a few people saying they want _some_ parts
> of the patch, which opens the suggestion that even people who want the
> patch are seeing parts of the patch that are too much.  I have seen this
> patch circling around, and I think it needs a step a back for analysis.

I'd say that patches 1 to 6 from the patch set are essential.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve code coverage of network address functions
Next
From: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_createsubscriber TAP test wrapping makes command options hard to read.