Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Date
Msg-id 5033.1358737894@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As a junior reviewer, I'd like to know if my main task should be to decide
>> between 1) writing a review convincing you or Tom that your judgement is
>> hasty, or 2) to convince the author that your judgement is correct.

> ... I think you should try
> to persuade the person that you think is wrong, whoever that is.

Absolutely.  Form your own opinion and marshal an argument for it.
At the end of the day, most of us are reasonable people and can be
convinced by appropriate evidence.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]