Re: pg_upgrade diffs on WIndows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Subject | Re: pg_upgrade diffs on WIndows |
Date | |
Msg-id | 5047A554.6040906@dunslane.net Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: pg_upgrade diffs on WIndows (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Responses |
Re: pg_upgrade diffs on WIndows
Re: pg_upgrade diffs on WIndows |
List | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/05/2012 09:46 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 09/05/2012 09:11 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> >> I reviewed this idea and supports this patch's inclusion in 9.2. I was >> unclear why it was needed, but I see pg_dumpall, which is the file >> pg_upgrade splits apart, as also using binary mode to write this file: >> >> OPF = fopen(filename, PG_BINARY_W); >> >> I agree with Tom that pg_upgrade needs some quiet time. ;-) Andrew, >> have a sufficient number of buildfarm members verified our recent >> patches that this can be added. My patch from last night was mostly C >> comments so isn't something that needs testing. > > > I am quite happy not committing anything for now. > > There are two buildfarm members doing pg_upgrade tests: crake (Fedora > 16) and pitta (Windows/Mingw64). The buildfarm code is experimental > and not in any release yet, and when it is the test will be optional. > > The PG_BINARY_W change has only been verified on a non-buildfarm setup > on my laptop (Mingw) > > Note that while it does look like there's a bug either in pg_upgrade > or pg_dumpall, it's probably mostly harmless (adding some spurious CRs > to function code bodies on Windows). I'd feel happier if it didn't, > and happier still if I knew for sure the ultimate origin. Your > pg_dumpall discovery above is interesting. I might have time later on > today to delve into all this. I'm out of contact for the next few hours. OK, I now have a complete handle on what's going on here, and withdraw my earlier statement that I am confused on this issue :-) First, one lot of CRs is produced because the pg_upgrade test script calls pg_dumpall without -f and redirects that to a file, which Windows kindly opens on text mode. The solution to that is to change the test script to use pg_dumpall -f instead. The second lot of CRs (seen in the second dump file in the diff i previously sent) is produced by pg_upgrade writing its output in text mode, which turns LF into CRLF. The solution to that is the patch to dump.c I posted, which, as Bruce observed, does the same thing that pg_dumpall does. Arguably, it should also open the input file in binary, so that if there really is a CRLF in the dump it won't be eaten. Another question is whether or not pg_dumpall (and pg_dump in text mode too for that matter) should be trying to suppress newline translation on its output even to stdout. It already does that for non-text formats (see call to setmode()) but I don't see why we shouldn't for text as well. But those are obviously longstanding bugs that we can leave to another day. cheers andrew
pgsql-hackers by date: