Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Rural Hunter |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed |
Date | |
Msg-id | 50613193.4010204@gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Responses |
Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
于 2012/9/25 11:00, Bruce Momjian 写道: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:41:19AM +0800, Rural Hunter wrote: >>>> I think the problem is on the options when I installed pgsql(both >>>> 9.1 and 9.2) >>>> Select the locale to be used by the new database cluster. >>>> >>>> Locale >>>> >>>> [1] [Default locale] >>>> [2] C >>>> [3] POSIX >>>> [4] zh_CN.utf8 >>>> [5] zh_HK.utf8 >>>> [6] zh_SG.utf8 >>>> [7] zh_TW.utf8 >>>> Please choose an option [1] : 4 >>>> I chose 4 instead of 1. I guess the default locale(option 1) is with dash. >>> Well, if you run that query on template0 in the old and new cluster, you >>> will see something different in the two of them. Could you have used >>> default in one and a non-dash in the other. >> Yes, that's true. The upgrade is fine with both fresh installs(9.1 >> and 9.2) with option above(without-dash). The problem only happens >> when I inited the 9.2 db with default locale(I guess that one has > OK, that is good to know. I developed the attached C program that does > the setlocale canonical test. On Debian Squeeze, I could not see any > change: if I pass en_US.UTF-8, I get en_US.UTF-8 returned; if I pass > en_US.UTF8, I get en_US.UTF8 returned. Can anyone test this and find a > case where the local is canonicalized? Run it this way: > > $ canonical > LC_COLLATE = 3 > LC_CTYPE = 0 > $ canonical 0 en_US.UTF8 > en_US.UTF8 > > We are looking for cases where the second argument produces a > non-matching locale name as output. It matches on my system(ubuntu 10.10 server): $ ./canonical LC_COLLATE = 3 LC_CTYPE = 0 $ ./canonical 0 zh_CN.UTF-8 zh_CN.UTF-8 $ ./canonical 0 zh_CN.UTF8 zh_CN.UTF8 $ ./canonical 0 zh_CN.utf8 zh_CN.utf8 $ ./canonical 0 zh_CN.utf-8 zh_CN.utf-8 I tested the checker with the patch: $ /opt/PostgreSQL/9.2/bin/pg_upgrade -b /opt/PostgreSQL/9.1/bin -B /opt/PostgreSQL/9.2/bin -d /raid/pgsql -D /raid/pg92data -c Performing Consistency Checks ----------------------------- Checking current, bin, and data directories ok Checking cluster versions ok Checking database user is a superuser ok Checking for prepared transactions ok Checking for reg* system OID user data types ok Checking for contrib/isn with bigint-passing mismatch ok lc_collate cluster values do not match: old "zh_CN.utf8", new "zh_CN.UTF-8" Failure, exiting zh_CN.utf8 is provided by the installer and zh_CN.UTF-8 is my system default. > > I have also attached a patch that reports the mismatching locale or > encoding names --- this should at least help with debugging and show > that a dash is the problem. > >> the dash). Just wondering why pg installer provides options without >> dash. > No idea. >
pgsql-hackers by date: