Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks
Date
Msg-id 5094.1165020786@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 15:52 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm?  What does partitioning have to do with it?

> SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE is not supported for inheritance queries.

True, but that's a planner/executor issue not a question of the
fundamental representation of the state on-disk.  (I have some ideas
about how to fix that one.)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dynamic Tracing docs
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dynamic Tracing docs