On 12/16/2012 07:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>>> On further thought the function name should just be what it is defined
>>> in postgresql, like this
>>> CREATE FUNCTION foo(a,b,c) AS $$
>>> def foo(a,b,c):
> BTW, how well will that play with overloaded function names? I don't
> particularly care for saying that PL/Python fails if you overload a
> function name across multiple schemas or argument lists ...
Currently each pl/python function gets compiled in its own python
module namespace, so this is not be a problem .
--------------
Hannu
