On 13.02.2013 18:20, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:
>> The basic idea of a fractal tree index is to attach a buffer to every
>> non-leaf page. On insertion, instead of descending all the way down to
>> the correct leaf page, the new tuple is put on the buffer at the root
>> page. When that buffer fills up, all the tuples in the buffer are
>> cascaded down to the buffers on the next level pages. And recursively,
>> whenever a buffer fills up at any level, it's flushed to the next level.
>
> [ scratches head... ] What's "fractal" about that? Or is that just a
> content-free marketing name for this technique?
I'd call it out as a marketing name. I guess it's fractal in the sense
that all levels of the tree can hold "leaf tuples" in the buffers; the
structure looks the same no matter how deep you zoom, like a fractal..
But "Buffered" would be more appropriate IMO.
- Heikki
