Re: function source - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Wright, George
Subject Re: function source
Date
Msg-id 51548D6D5BEB57468163194A8C1A0E98C6BE59@MAGPTCPEXC02.na.mag-ias.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: function source  (Mark Roberts <mailing_lists@pandapocket.com>)
Responses Re: function source
List pgsql-novice
So does that mean there is no way to hide the source for procedural
language functions in postgresql?


-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:mailing_lists@pandapocket.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:34 PM
To: Wright, George
Cc: pgsql-novice@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] function source

I think that we have some functions that are defined in C.  I'd have to
check the repository to get the source.

-Mark

On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 10:47 -0500, Wright, George wrote:
> Is there a way to hide/encrypt the source for functions I might write
> in any of the procedural languages?
>
>
>
> Doing \df+ <func> shows all of it.
>
>


pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: "Schoenit, Tobias AT/BHL-ZTPS"
Date:
Subject: Dataimport from remote db
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Dataimport from remote db