Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List
Date
Msg-id 51C887A1.7010908@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 06/24/2013 10:48 AM, Claudio Freire wrote:

>>> Reviewer recognition should be on the same level as the submitter.
>>
>> The problem with that is that that HUGELY depends on the patch and the
>> review. There are patches where reviewers do a good percentage of the
>> work and others where they mostly tell that "compiles & runs".
>
>
> Well, you can't so arbitrarily pick who you're recognizing as
> contributor and who you aren't. So why not mention them all? They did
> work for it, some more than others, but they all worked. And since
> whoever submitted a patch (and got it committed) must have reviewed
> something as well, they'd be recognized for both reviewing and
> submitting.
>

Exactly. Just make it a simple policy:

Submitters and Reviewers are listed in that order:

Submitter, reviewer, reviewer

That way submitter gets first bill, satisfying the ego (as well as 
professional consideration) but reviewers are also fully recognized.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drkae

-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms   a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List