Hackers,
I'd like to take a straw poll here on how we should acknowledge
reviewers. Please answer the below with your thoughts, either on-list
or via private email.
How should reviewers get credited in the release notes?
a) not at all
b) in a single block titled "Reviewers for this version" at the bottom.
c) on the patch they reviewed, for each patch
Should there be a criteria for a "creditable" review?
a) no, all reviews are worthwhile
b) yes, they have to do more than "it compiles"
c) yes, only code reviews should count
Should reviewers for 9.4 get a "prize", such as a t-shirt, as a
promotion to increase the number of non-submitter reviewers?
a) yes
b) no
c) yes, but submitters and committers should get it too
Thanks for your feedback!
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
