Re: Q about InsertIndexResult - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Q about InsertIndexResult
Date
Msg-id 5222.1045070145@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Q about InsertIndexResult  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@stack.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Teodor Sigaev <teodor@stack.net> writes:
> One reason why existing interface is not good:
> Who say, that for one heap tuple should exists only one index tuple?

Good point.  Is that reason enough to change it?  Not sure.  The index
AM doesn't really have to bother with telling the truth in the
InsertIndexResult it returns ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Options for growth
Next
From: Barry Lind
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Wrong charset mappings