Cea Stapleton <cea@healthfinch.com> writes:
> We’re using pg_restore (PostgreSQL) 9.5.4 for the restores. We’ve used variations on the job number:
> /usr/bin/pg_restore -j 6 -Fc -O -c -d DBNAME RESTORE_FILE”
OK ... do you actually need the -c, and if so why?
> We’ll take a look at the memory overcommit - would that also explain the index issues we were seeing before we were
seeingthe crashes?
Unlikely. I'm guessing that there's some sort of race condition involved
in parallel restore with -c, but it's not very clear what.
regards, tom lane