Re: pg_upgrade & tablespaces - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Subject | Re: pg_upgrade & tablespaces |
Date | |
Msg-id | 52B4DD5F.7040602@gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | pg_upgrade & tablespaces (Joseph Kregloh <jkregloh@sproutloud.com>) |
Responses |
Re: pg_upgrade & tablespaces
Re: pg_upgrade & tablespaces |
List | pgsql-general |
On 12/20/2013 02:01 PM, Joseph Kregloh wrote: > > [root@postgres-93-upgrade > /usr/local/pgsql/data/drupal___dbspace]# ls -la > /home/jkregloh/pg_data/data/__drupal_dbspace/ > drwx------ 4 pgsql pgsql 4 Oct 20 2011 PG_9.0_201008051 > > > So that looks like it worked, or am I missing something. > > > Yes, it works but once it gets to the step where it creates the > relations I get the error: > > Copying user relation files > ...l/data/drupal_dbspace/PG_9.0_201008051/2752430/10913518 > error while copying relation "pg_catalog.pg_largeobject" > ("/usr/local/pgsql/data/drupal_dbspace/PG_9.0_201008051/2752430/10913518" > to "/usr/local/pgsql/data/drupal_dbspace/PG_9.3_201306121/16499/12301"): No > such file or directory Best guess is /home/jkregloh/pg_data/data/drupal_dbspace/ is pointing back to /usr/local/pgsql/data in the other jail. > > > > Case B: > pg_upgrade -b /home/jkregloh/pg_bin/ -B /usr/local/bin/ -D > /usr/local/pgsql_93/data -d /usr/local/pgsql/data/ -P 5452 -p 5451 > > > You realize order of switches is not important, but case is, where > lower case is old version, upper is new version. I mention this > because the ports are switched again, assuming your previous > statement is correct: > > " But the ports I am using are 5451 for 9.3 and 5452 for 9.0." > > > Thanks for pointing this out. I reset and ran: > > pg_upgrade -b /home/jkregloh/pg_bin/ -B /usr/local/bin/ -D > /usr/local/pgsql_93/data -d /usr/local/pgsql/data/ -p 5452 -P 5451 > > Same results as I posted previously for Case B. > > > [pgsql@postgres-93-upgrade > /usr/local/pgsql_93/data/__drupal_dbspace]$ ls > -la /usr/local/pgsql/data/drupal___dbspace/ > drwx------ 4 pgsql pgsql 4 Oct 20 2011 PG_9.0_201008051 > drwx------ 3 pgsql pgsql 3 Dec 20 16:44 PG_9.3_201306121 > > > To me this looks crossed wires, possibly from the crossed ports above. > > What has me confused is where /usr/local/pgsql_93/data comes from? > Did you actually install a Postgres 9.3 instance there? > Or is the 9.3 instance installed in the location in Case A > /usr/local/pgsql/data/ ? > > > For Case B I switch it around the /usr/local/pgsql/data belongs to 9.0 > and /usr/local/pgsql_93/data belongs to 9.3. This I found allows me to > not get the same error as I do in Case A. > > /usr/local/pgsql_93/data is the data dir of the 9.3 cluster, created > using /usr/local/bin/initdb -D /usr/local/pgsql_93/data And /usr/local/pgsql was re-initdbed with a 9.0 cluster, because previously it was the 9.3 cluster? And you are sure /usr/local/bin has the 9.3 binaries? Personally I would say at this point the relationships between versions are so confused it would seem best to start from scratch. My suggestions: 1) Create a new jail with a copy of the test 9.0 cluster located in /usr/local/pgsql. 2) In that jail install a new 9.3 cluster using the --prefix= switch to configure to have it install in a different location in the jail. 3) Use pg_upgrade. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@gmail.com
pgsql-general by date: