Re: vacuum vs pg_repack for clearing bloat? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: vacuum vs pg_repack for clearing bloat?
Date
Msg-id 52D73A03.4060508@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: vacuum vs pg_repack for clearing bloat?  (Lists <lists@benjamindsmith.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 1/15/2014 5:37 PM, Lists wrote:
> it's clearing out the cruft that results from creating temp tables,
> loading a bunch of data, then dropping the table,

there shoudl be zero cruft.  when the table is dropped, it should pooferate.



--
john r pierce                                      37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum vs pg_repack for clearing bloat?
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum vs pg_repack for clearing bloat?