Re: DB size and TABLE sizes don't seem to add up - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: DB size and TABLE sizes don't seem to add up
Date
Msg-id 53031B18.5060103@vmware.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to DB size and TABLE sizes don't seem to add up  (David Wall <d.wall@computer.org>)
Responses Re: DB size and TABLE sizes don't seem to add up
List pgsql-performance
On 02/18/2014 12:14 AM, David Wall wrote:
> I am running PG 9.2.4 and I am trying to figure out why my database size
> shows one value, but the sum of my total relation sizes is so much less.
>
> Basically, I'm told my database is 188MB, but the sum of my total
> relation sizes adds up to just 8.7MB, which is 1/20th of the reported
> total.  Where is the 19/20th of my data then?  We do make significant
> use of large objects, so I suspect it's in there.  Is there a relation
> size query that would include the large object data associated with any
> OIDs in those tables?

You can use "select pg_total_relation_size('pg_largeobject')" to get the
total size of the large objects. Attributing large objects to the tables
that refer them is more difficult. For a single table, something like this:

select sum(pg_column_size(lo.data))
from lotest_stash_values t, pg_largeobject lo
where lo.loid = t.loid;

Replace "lotest_stash_values" with the table's name and lo.loid with the
name of the OID column.

- Heikki


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimal settings for RAID controller - optimized for writes
Next
From: Michael Stone
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimal settings for RAID controller - optimized for writes