On 04/13/2014 08:48 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Andrew Dunstan (andrew@dunslane.net) wrote:
>> Are you really sure we can do this consistently? The regression
>> tests have to run against all sorts of settings, including those we
>> have no control over via installcheck.
> Sure? No. However, there are quite a few existing regression tests
> that do the same (with costs off, of course), and things on the
> buildfarm look more-or-less clean again, so I'm at least hopeful.
>
> I can simplify the tests some if they end up causing issues.
>
>
OK, fair enough.
cheers
andrew
