Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date
Msg-id 535596ED.2000204@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/21/14, 4:08 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> If the community had more *BSD presence I think it would be great but it isn't all that viable at this point. I do
knowhowever that no-one in this community would turn down a team of FreeBSD advocates helping us make PostgreSQL
awesomefor PostgreSQL.
 

I assume you meant FreeBSD awesome for PostgreSQL? :)

I'm also a big fan of *BSD but the reality is it's MUCH harder to get *BSD into a corporation than linux. Now, if
FreeBSDhad a bunch of stuff that made PostgreSQL run like 4x faster on *BSD than Linux that would be a different
story.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect                       jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?