On 05/27/2014 10:53 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I've been on the receiving end of a couple of mumbles about the fact
> that the JSON rendering code ignores casts of builtin types to JSON.
> This was originally done as an optimization to avoid doing cache lookups
> for casts for things we knew quite well how to turn into JSON values
> (unlike, say, hstore). However, there is at least one concrete case
> where this has some possibly undesirable consequences, namely
> timestamps. Many JSON processors, especially JavaScript/ECMAScript
> processors, require timestamp values to be in ISO 8601 format, with a
> 'T' between the date part and the time part, and thus they barf on the
> output we produce for such values.
I don't understand what ignoring casts of builtin types to JSON means.
Can you give an example?
- Heikki
