Re: AIO v2.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: AIO v2.0
Date
Msg-id 539954.1734647669@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AIO v2.0  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: AIO v2.0
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> My current thoughts around this are that we should generally, independent of
> io_uring, increase the FD limit ourselves.

I'm seriously down on that, because it amounts to an assumption that
we own the machine and can appropriate all its resources.  If ENFILE
weren't a thing, it'd be all right, but that is a thing.  We have no
business trying to consume resources the DBA didn't tell us we could.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: AIO v2.0
Next
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Can rs_cindex be < 0 for bitmap heap scans?