Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bosco Rama
Subject Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore
Date
Msg-id 53B5F1C0.2080600@boscorama.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 07/03/14 17:00, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 7/3/2014 4:51 PM, David Wall wrote:
>> That's interesting.  Since I gzip the resulting output, I'll give -Z0
>> a try.  I didn't realize that any compression was on by default.
>
> default compression only happens in with pg_dump -Fc

Yeah.  OP says he is using --format=c


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bosco Rama
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore
Next
From: Rodrigo Gonzalez
Date:
Subject: Re: which odbc version (32 or 64 bit) should be installed in Client ?