Re: logfile character encoding - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Kai Borgolte
Subject Re: logfile character encoding
Date
Msg-id 53F212F3.3000504@gmx.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logfile character encoding  (<Holger.Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis@it.nrw.de>)
List pgsql-general
Am 18.08.2014 15:31, schrieb Holger.Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis@it.nrw.de:

> Wikipedia says that UTF-8 is code page 65001, in Microsoft notation (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_page).
Doesthis help in any way (i.e. does German_Germany.65001 work for you)? 

No, I tried that value yesterday, see my answer to Adrian.

It seems Unicode encodings are just not target of Windows Locales. Which
in my opinion is reasonable: Why should it be a localization issue, how
a program writes Unicode to a file? When a localized Windows suggests
two different 8bit-charsets for usage (ANSI and OEM), this doesn't
hinder a program to write Unicode. Why can't PostgreSQL "Postmaster" do it?
--
Kai Borgolte, Bonn


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Redoute
Date:
Subject: Re: logfile character encoding
Next
From: Granthana
Date:
Subject: Re: .pgpass being ignored