Re: Partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: Partitioning
Date
Msg-id 54BCB0E2.5020405@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioning  (James Sewell <james.sewell@lisasoft.com>)
Responses Re: Partitioning
List pgsql-general
On 1/18/2015 11:13 PM, James Sewell wrote:
>
> Each index is about 2.5GB, I suspect I am trying to read a these into
> memory in entirety.

an 11GB table with a (presumably integer) primary key requires an 2.5GB
index ?      100 of these would need 250GB of shared_buffers to stay
resident, not likely.





--
john r pierce                                      37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: James Sewell
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioning
Next
From: Jeremy Palmer
Date:
Subject: Re: SSO Windows-to-unix