Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0
Date
Msg-id 54CFA93D.9080609@vmware.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/30/2015 01:38 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I have not addressed the recently described problems with exclusion
> constraints. I hope we can do so shortly. Simply removing IGNORE
> support until such time as we straighten that all out (9.6?) seems
> like the simplest solution. No need to block the progress of "UPSERT",
> since exclusion constraint support was only ever going to be useful
> for the less compelling IGNORE variant. What do other people think? Do
> you agree with my view that we should shelve IGNORE support for now,
> Heikki?

No, I don't agree. Let's fix it.

- Heikki




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd behavior of updatable security barrier views on foreign tables