On 2/16/15 2:41 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Since you actually don't want cancellations for the long running
> reporting queries it very much might be sensible to switch to a more
> complicated version of HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() if there's longrunning
> queries. One that can recognize if rows are actually visible to any
> backend, or if there are just snapshots that see older rows. I've
> previously wondered how hard this would be, but I don't think it's
> *that* hard. And it'd be a much more general solution.
Josh Berkus mentioned on IRC that they're working on improving vacuum,
and I think it was something along these lines.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
