On 2015/01/15 16:35, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On 2014/12/23 0:36, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, we need to do something about the PlanRowMark data structure.
>> Aside from the pre-existing issue in postgres_fdw, we need to fix it
>> to support inheritance trees in which more than one rowmark method
>> is being used. That rte.hasForeignChildren thing is a crock,
>
>> The idea I'd had about that was to convert the markType field into a
>> bitmask, so that a parent node's markType could represent the logical
>> OR of the rowmark methods being used by all its children.
> As I said before, that seems to me like a good idea. So I'll update the
> patch based on that if you're okey with it.
Done based on your ideas: (a) add a field to PlanRowMark to record the
original lock strength to fix the postgres_fdw issue and (b) convert its
markType field into a bitmask to support the inheritance trees. I think
that both work well and that (a) is useful for the other places.
Patch attached, which has been created on top of [1].
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
[1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/54BCBBF8.3020103@lab.ntt.co.jp
