Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Date
Msg-id 5531.1556812964@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-05-02 11:41:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> But don't we need to worry about resetting relfrozenxid?

> Indexes don't have that though? We couldn't do it for pg_class itself,
> but that's not a problem here.

Hmm.  Again, that seems like the sort of assumption that could bite
us later.  But maybe we could add some assertions that the new values
match the old?  I'll experiment.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade --clone error checking
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing