Re: extract(year from date) doesn't use index but maybe could? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: extract(year from date) doesn't use index but maybe could?
Date
Msg-id 5533E8F4.2050400@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to extract(year from date) doesn't use index but maybe could?  (Jon Dufresne <jon.dufresne@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: extract(year from date) doesn't use index but maybe could?
List pgsql-performance

On 04/19/15 19:16, Jon Dufresne wrote:
> Given the table:
>
> CREATE TABLE dates (id SERIAL, d DATE NOT NULL, t TEXT NOT NULL)
>
> With an *index* on field d. The following two queries are functionally
> equivalent:
>
> 1. SELECT * FROM dates WHERE d >= '1900-01-01'
> 2. SELECT * FROM dates WHERE EXTRACT(year from d) >= 1900'
>
> By functionally equivalent, they will return the same result set.
>
> Query 2 does not use the index, adding a performance cost. It seems
> there is an opportunity for optimization to handle these two queries
> equivalently to take advantage of the index.

Or you might try creating an expression index ...

CREATE INDEX date_year_idx ON dates((extract(year from d)));


regards

--
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Jon Dufresne
Date:
Subject: extract(year from date) doesn't use index but maybe could?
Next
From: Jon Dufresne
Date:
Subject: Re: extract(year from date) doesn't use index but maybe could?