Re: So where are we on the open commitfest? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?
Date
Msg-id 5715.1319859606@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> * Range Types
>> 
>> This has certainly had plenty of work done too. �If it's not committable
>> yet, I think we should mark it Returned With Feedback for now.

> I have been thinking about looking at committing at least part of
> this, but thought Heikki might be planning to pick it up.

Yeah, this one is in Heikki's court AFAIK.

I've updated the commitfest items for which there seemed to be no
disagreement.  We still have

>> * Allow encoding specific character incrementer (on your head)
>> * Separating bgwriter and checkpointer (on Simon's)
>> * Non-inheritable check constraints (on Greg Stark's)
>> * Range Types (on Heikki's)
>> * unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf (Simon's on the hook to advance this discussion)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped
Next
From: Hitoshi Harada
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server