Re: Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates
Date
Msg-id 594958.1611156310@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates
List pgsql-bugs
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
> Pushed as commit 6b4d3046f4, and backpatched down to version 12, where 
> this bug was introduced. It will appear in the next minor release.

I see you noted that REINDEX is required to repair any corrupted indexes.
For the purposes of the release notes, can we characterize which indexes
might be affected, or do we just have to say "better reindex all GIST
indexes"?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: Bug Report | Using ts_headline with the <-> operator
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug Report | Using ts_headline with the <-> operator